Tipsarević izgubio od Fiša

 
Srpski teniser Janko Tipsarević izgubio je od 19. igrača sveta Mardija Fiša iz SAD sa 0:2 (2:6, 6:7) u prvom kolu turnira u Pekingu.

Meč je trajao sat i 52 minuta, a mogao je i duže da je Tipsarević u taj brejku drugog seta vodjstvo od 5:2 u poenima pretvorio u izjednačenje od 1:1.

Fiš je, ipak, uspeo da preokrene rezultat i stigne do plasmana u drugog kolo turnira gde ga očekuje još jedan Dejvis kup reprezentativac Srbije i prvi nosilac na turniru Novak Djoković.

Drugi teniser sveta, branilac trofeja iz prošle sezone, u prvom kolu će igrati sa domaćim favoritom MaoČin Gongom, koji se u Pekingu takmiči zahvaljujući pozivu organizatora.

Djoković i Fiš su do sada igrali pet mečeva, a svaki put je pobedio srpski teniser. Ove godine Djoković je Fiša pobedio na Otvorenom prvenstvu SAD i na Mastersu u Indijan Velsu.

Nagradni fond turnira iznosi 2.100.000 dolara.









Izvor: 
B92



Bookmark and Share

Komentari

vNRknUBnBrTLhT

Keep it coming, wreitrs, this is good stuff.

uDkTrLkWoMOTHgFi

V17LjS ewytyulgfeya

COygcQaQSVkDoR

YeFECSRzarsVEHMyHLJ

udMthsxusrb

WulPurqmSWZbtPjLGHq

HsetrjnQyrvrkq

KRwadjDeeeDnafOZ

yOcrumoFPzW

fzgstRMJer

AfEhbEBerlbCcR

ZcCrfjAtmD

EiinrQsGcsN

sVRwWKBTUXYT

Perecft shot! Thanks for your post!

cialis

sqsffue cialis >:-OOO tadalafil 2416

YZfLHTifEJdijeUxbU

ahqXby hkkleqdbxtuh

RWjBvlBymsv

UVUUNMTKPsKCCJi

Paki, aunque con retraso, te comunico que todos los que lo solicist teis a trav s de los coemntarios est is admitidos/as

cheap auto insurance online free car insurance quotes

rKSksHbBpI

Paki, aunque con retraso, te comunico que todos los que lo solicist teis a trav s de los coemntarios est is admitidos/as

car insurence car insurance quotes

tpNmoTULzCqXPh

Sure, I totally agree, but perhaps it goes both ways as your poll indicates. There are also attempts to stir up nationalist sentiment here, especially with regards to Georgia and Azerbaijan. Incidentally, the poll doesn’t give a figure for how Georgians view Armenia so the situation is not clear at all. You say “A recent poll demonstrated that Georgian’s do not consider Armenia a friendly country,” but there is no data.Is it more or less than the 84 percent of Armenians who don’t consider Georgia to be a friendly country. Anyway, what’s your point? That the ALL-RUSSIAN center of the study of public opinion is a credible opinion pollster? From what I understand it started off as a credible organization respected in Russia and the West, but is now referred to as “[Russian] State Controlled.”It was founded by Yuri Levada and was really valued, but then Putin removed him and appointed his own people. Levada claims it was because the Kremlin didn’t want his polls on Chechnya published during an election year. His polls also showed that Putin’s popularity was lower than the Kremlin were happy with. His replacement, Valeriy Fedorov, is reportedly referred to as a member of the presidential administration.That’s your primary source and argument? That’s the poll you’re sarcastically referring me to look at? One conducted by a State-run organization directly linked to the Kremlin? Even worse that the Armenian media would treat it as somehow reliable. Then again, the professionalism of journalists here is so low and we know that newspapers and TV companies reports only what is suits their political and economic goals.Still, I do agree that anti-Georgian sentiment is strong here and anti-Armenia sentiment is the same there. However, the two feed off each other and that should be understood. Regardless, I despise nationalism among Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Georgians (and everyone else for that matter) and let me just ask this question. Many of those bloggers decrying the “death of democracy” in Georgia took what position during the February presidential election and 1 March clashes? Were there posts on the “death of democracy” in Armenia?Rhetorical question — of course there weren’t.Basically, is this about democracy and human rights or something else? Incidentally, all sides are guilty of this. My take is that tolerance and respect for others is key here, but I doubt this action was designed with that in mind. That’s their right, of course, but it was not held to serve the purpose of promoting tolerance for minority and religious rights in GeorgiaIf anything, it was a nationalist response to a nationalist action and was staged to serve a nationalist purpose. That is, it was to promote anti-Georgian attitudes in Armenia. Or maybe when the next Jewish monument in Yerevan is vandalized or swastikas daubed on walls happens, we’ll refer to “Armenians” being nationalist, racist and anti-semitic?Anyway, unfortunately, the gut knee jerk reaction of ALL ethnic groups in this region veers towards nationalism when we should all be working to changing that mentality if there is to be a peaceful future where everyone can respect the rights of others. We need to CHANGE nationalist stereotypes and prejudices and NOT feed into them. Unfortunately, Georgian nationalism in terms of Norashen mobilizes the Armenian nationalists, Armenians pushing a nationalist line in Javakheti creates a knee-jerk reaction from Georgian nationalists, and vice-versa. It’s also why this region will not be democratic or tolerant for a long, long time to come.

viagra propecia

Pošalji novi komentar

  • Adrese internet stranica i e-adrese automatski pretvoriti u veze.
  • Dozvoljene HTML oznake: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Redove i paragrafe automatski prelomiti.

Više informacija o formatiranju

CAPTCHA
Ovo pitanje Vam se postavlja radi prevencije SPAM poruka.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.